Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison of the Success Rate of Laryngeal Mask Air Way Insertion in Classic & Rotatory Methods in Pediatric Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia

Mir Mousa Aghdashi 1 , Mohammad Amin Valizade Hasanloei 1 , * , Rahman Abbasivash 1 , Shahram Shokouhi 1 and Shahram Salehi Gharehvaran 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
Article information
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine: April 2017, 7 (2); e38899
  • Published Online: January 24, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: August 24, 2016
  • Revised: December 5, 2016
  • Accepted: January 11, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/aapm.38899

To Cite: Aghdashi M M, Valizade Hasanloei M A, Abbasivash R, Shokouhi S, Salehi Gharehvaran S. Comparison of the Success Rate of Laryngeal Mask Air Way Insertion in Classic & Rotatory Methods in Pediatric Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia, Anesth Pain Med. 2017 ; 7(2):e38899. doi: 10.5812/aapm.38899.

Abstract
Copyright © 2017, Iranian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISRAPM). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
References
  • 1. Zangi M, Hadavai SMR, Tavakkolian AR. Classic laryngeal mask airway insertion with four different methods in elective surgeries under general anesthesia: A comparison of efficacy, ease, speed of insertion and post-operative complications. Anesthesiol Pain Official J. 2013; 3(2): 89-96
  • 2. Nourozi A, Fateh S, Talebi H, Akbari AR, Roudbarani M, Kouchaki M. Comparing the effectiveness of classic laryngeal mask airway (LMAc) with streamlined liner pharyngeal airway (SLIPA) in general anesthesia. Anesthesiol Pain Official J. 2012; 3(1): 54-60
  • 3. Mahoori A, Noroozinia H, Hasani E, Karami N, Pashaei N, Hatami S. The effect of low-dose remifentanil on the hemodynamic responses of endotracheal extubation. Acta Med Iran. 2014; 52(11): 844-7[PubMed]
  • 4. Henderson J. Air way management in adult. 2010; : 1573-610
  • 5. Entezari SR, Mirdehghan SMH, Imani F, Hassani V, Bazargani B. Comparison of the Routine and New Methods of Intubation withLaryngeal Mask Airway. Iran Uni Med Sci J. 2009; 16(62): 59-64
  • 6. Stroumpoulis K, Isaia C, Bassiakou E, Pantazopoulos I, Troupis G, Mazarakis A, et al. A comparison of the i-gel and classic LMA insertion in manikins by experienced and novice physicians. Eur J Emerg Med. 2012; 19(1): 24-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Kazemi AP, Daneshoforooz MA, Omidvari S. A Comparison between a Two Person Insertion Technique of Laryngeal Mask Airway and the Classic One Person Technique. Galen Med J. 2013; 2(4): 179-82
  • 8. Haghighi M, Mohammadzadeh A, Naderi B, Seddighinejad A, Movahedi H. Comparing two methods of LMA insertion; classic versus simplified (airway). Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2010; 20(4): 509-14[PubMed]
  • 9. Pournajafian A, Alimian M, Rokhtabnak F, Ghodraty M, Mojri M. Success rate of airway devices insertion: laryngeal mask airway versus supraglottic gel device. Anesth Pain Med. 2015; 5(2): 22068[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Kini G, Alex J, Krishna HM. Compearison of two techniques for insertion of classic laryngeal mask airway. J Anesthesial Clin Phrmacol. 2008; 24(4): 441-3
  • 11. Jamil SN, Alam M, Usmani H, Khan MM. A Study of the Use of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in Children and its Comparison with Endotracheal Intubation. Indian J Anaesth. 2009; 53(2): 174-8[PubMed]
  • 12. Grebenik CR, Ferguson C, White A. The laryngeal mask airway in pediatric radiotherapy. Anesthesiology. 1990; 72(3): 474-7[PubMed]
  • 13. Mason DG, Bingham RM. The laryngeal mask airway in children. Anaesthesia. 1990; 45(9): 760-3[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Ramachandran SK, Mathis MR, Tremper KK, Shanks AM, Kheterpal S. Predictors and clinical outcomes from failed Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique: a study of 15,795 patients. Anesthesiology. 2012; 116(6): 1217-26[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Asida SM, Ahmed SS. Ease of insertion of the laryngeal mask airway in pediatric surgical patients: Predictors of failure and outcome. Saudi J Anaesth. 2016; 10(3): 295-300[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Mankoo R, Langen KE, Mandler T. A randomized crossover comparison between the Laryngeal Mask Airway-Unique and the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012; 22(2): 161-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, Yousaf F, Wong J, Wong DT, et al. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010; 27(7): 602-7[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments