Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison Between Pendant Position and Traditional Sitting Position for Successful Spinal Puncture in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section

Pryambodho Pryambodho 1 , * , Alfan Mahdi Nugroho 1 and Desy Januarrifianto 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Article information
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine: June 2017, 7 (3); e14300
  • Published Online: June 21, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: January 12, 2017
  • Revised: February 13, 2017
  • Accepted: March 15, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/aapm.14300

To Cite: Pryambodho P, Mahdi Nugroho A, Januarrifianto D. Comparison Between Pendant Position and Traditional Sitting Position for Successful Spinal Puncture in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section, Anesth Pain Med. 2017 ; 7(3):e14300. doi: 10.5812/aapm.14300.

Abstract
Copyright © 2017, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Chestnut DH, Wong CA, Tsen LC, Kee WDN, Beilin Y, Mhyre J. Chestnut's obstetric anesthesia: principles and practice. 2014;
  • 2. Wong CA, Nathan N, Brown DL. Chestnut obstetric anesthesia: Principles and practice. 2013; : 223-45
  • 3. Tsen LC. Chestnut obstetric anesthesia: Principles and practice. 2013; : 521-73
  • 4. de Oliveira Filho GR, Gomes HP, da Fonseca MHZ, Hoffman JC, Pederneiras SG, Garcia JHS. Predictors of successful neuraxial block: a prospective study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002; 19(6): 447-51[DOI]
  • 5. Drasner K, Larson MD. Basics of anesthesia. 2007; : 241-71
  • 6. Fisher KS, Arnholt AT, Douglas ME, Vandiver SL, Nguyen DH. A randomized trial of the traditional sitting position versus the hamstring stretch position for labor epidural needle placement. Anesth Analg. 2009; 109(2): 532-4[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Soltani Mohammadi S, Hassani M, Marashi S M. Comparing the Squatting Position and Traditional Sitting Position for Ease of Spinal Needle Placement: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2014; 4(2)[DOI]
  • 8. Shabanian G, Saadat M. A position for administration of difficult spinal anesthesia. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8(3): 190-1[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Grau T, Leipold RW, Horter J, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. The lumbar epidural space in pregnancy: visualization by ultrasonography. Br J Anaesth. 2001; 86(6): 798-804[PubMed]
  • 10. Tekeoglu I, Adak B, Bozkurt M, Gurbuzoglu N. Distraction of lumbar vertebrae in gravitational traction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(9): 1061-3[PubMed]
  • 11. Shankar H, Rajput K, Murugiah K. Correlation between spinous process dimensions and ease of spinal anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2012; 56(3): 250-4[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Sukmono RB. Buku ajar anestesiologi. Jakarta: Departemen Anestesiologi dan Intensive Care Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia/RS Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta. 2012; : 451-75
  • 13. Brooks RR, Oudekerk C, Olson RL, Daniel C, Vacchiano C, Maye J. The effect of spinal introducer needle use on postoperative back pain. AANA J. 2002; 70(6): 449-52[PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments