Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Published by: Kowsar

Comparing the Hemodynamic Effects of Spinal Anesthesia in Preeclamptic and Healthy Parturients During Cesarean Section

Mahshid Nikooseresht 1 , * , Mohamad Ali Seif Rabiei 2 , Pooran Hajian 1 , Razieh Dastaran 3 and Nasim Alipour 4
Authors Information
1 Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran
2 Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine , Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran
3 Anesthesiologist, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
4 Department of Anesthesiology, School of Para medicine, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran
Article information
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine: June 01, 2016, 6 (3); e11519
  • Published Online: June 5, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: July 3, 2013
  • Revised: April 26, 2016
  • Accepted: May 28, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/aapm.11519

To Cite: Nikooseresht M, Seif Rabiei M A, Hajian P, Dastaran R, Alipour N. Comparing the Hemodynamic Effects of Spinal Anesthesia in Preeclamptic and Healthy Parturients During Cesarean Section, Anesth Pain Med. 2016 ; 6(3):e11519. doi: 10.5812/aapm.11519.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Iranian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISRAPM). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
  • 1. Flood P, Rollins MD. Anesthesia for obstetrics. 2015; : 2344-8
  • 2. Aya AG, Mangin R, Vialles N, Ferrer JM, Robert C, Ripart J, et al. Patients with severe preeclampsia experience less hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery than healthy parturients: a prospective cohort comparison. Anesth Analg. 2003; 97(3): 867-72[PubMed]
  • 3. Pournajafian A, Rokhtabnak F, Kholdbarin A, Ghodrati M, Ghavam S. Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl regarding hemodynamic changes due to endotracheal intubation in preeclamptic parturient candidate for cesarean delivery. Anesth Pain Med. 2012; 2(2): 90-3[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Chumpathong S, Sirithanetbhol S, Salakij B, Visalyaputra S, Parakkamodom S, Wataganara T. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing cesarean section: a 10-year retrospective study from a single tertiary care center: anesthetic point of view. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; : 1-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Santos AC, Birnbach DJ. Spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in severely preeclamptic women: don't throw out the baby with the bathwater! Anesth Analg. 2005; 101(3): 859-61[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Hood D, Curry RRN. Spinal versus Epidural Anesthesia for cesarean section in severely preeclamptic patients: A retrospective survey. Anesthesiol. 1999; 90(5): 1276-82
  • 7. Visalyaputra S, Rodanant O, Somboonviboon W, Tantivitayatan K, Thienthong S, Saengchote W. Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery in severe preeclampsia: a prospective randomized, multicenter study. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101(3): 862-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Saha D, Ghosh S, Bhattacharyya S, Mallik S, Pal R, Niyogi M, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic response and vasopressor requirement following spinal anaesthesia between normotensive and severe preeclamptic women undergoing caesarean section: A prospective study. J Obstet Anaesth Critical Care. 2013; 3(1): 23
  • 9. Alimian M, Mohseni M, Safaeian R, Faiz SH, Majedi MA. Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch 6% and crystalloids for preloading in elective caesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Med Arch. 2014; 68(4): 279-81[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Fathi M, Imani F, Joudi M, Goodarzi V. Comparison Between the Effects of Ringer`s Lactate and Hydroxyethyl Starch on Hemodynamic Parameters After Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2013; 2(3): 127-33[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Hood DD, Boese PA. Epidural and Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Section in Severely Pre-Eclamptic Parturients. Reg Anesth. 1992; 17(1): 35
  • 12. Van de Velde M, Berends N, Spitz B, Teunkens A, Vandermeersch E. Low-dose combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia vs. conventional epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section in pre-eclampsia: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004; 21(6): 454-9[PubMed]
  • 13. Berends N, Teunkens A, Vandermeersch E, Van de Velde M. A randomized trial comparing low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and conventional epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2005; 56(2): 155-62[PubMed]
  • 14. Chaudhary S, Salhotra R. Subarachnoid block for caesarean section in severe preeclampsia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011; 27(2): 169-73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Aya AG, Vialles N, Tanoubi I, Mangin R, Ferrer JM, Robert C, et al. Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension: a risk comparison between patients with severe preeclampsia and healthy women undergoing preterm cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101(3): 869-75[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Sharwood-Smith G, Drummond GB. Hypotension in obstetric spinal anaesthesia: a lesson from pre-eclampsia. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 102(3): 291-4[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Mendes FF, Hennemann G, Luft A, Farias C, Braga S. Hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia for cesarean section are equivalent in severely preeclamptic and healthy parturients. J Anesthe Clinic Re. 2012; 2011
  • 18. Clark VA, Sharwood-Smith GH, Stewart AV. Ephedrine requirements are reduced during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in preeclampsia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005; 14(1): 9-13[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Nag DS, Samaddar DP, Chatterjee A, Kumar H, Dembla A. Vasopressors in obstetric anesthesia: A current perspective. World J Clin Cases. 2015; 3(1): 58-64[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Dyer RA, Piercy JL, Reed AR. The role of the anaesthetist in the management of the pre-eclamptic patient. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007; 20(3): 168-74[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Dyer RA, Piercy JL, Reed AR, Lombard CJ, Schoeman LK, James MF. Hemodynamic changes associated with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in severe preeclampsia. Anesthesiology. 2008; 108(5): 802-11[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Jain K, Makkar JK, Yadanappudi S, Anbarasan I, Gander S. Two doses of spinal bupivacaine for caesarean delivery in severe preeclampsia: a pilot study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012; 21(2): 195-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Roofthooft E, Van de Velde M. Low-dose spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section to prevent spinal-induced hypotension. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008; 21(3): 259-62[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Xiao F, Xu WP, Zhang XM, Zhang YF, Wang LZ, Chen XZ. ED 50 and ED 95 of intrathecal bupivacaine coadministered with sufentanil for cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural in severely preeclamptic patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015; 128(3): 285-90[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Moslemi F, Rasooli S. Comparison of spinal versus general anaesthesia for caesarean delivery in patients with severe preeclampsia. J Med Sci. 2007; 7: 1044-8
  • 26. Ajuzieogu OV, Ezike HA, Amucheazi AO, Enwereji J. A retrospective study of the outcome of cesarean section for women with severe pre-eclampsia in a third world setting. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011; 5(1): 15-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 27. Dyer RA, Els I, Farbas J, Torr GJ, Schoeman LK, James MF. Prospective, randomized trial comparing general with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in preeclamptic patients with a nonreassuring fetal heart trace. Anesthesiology . 2003; 99(3): 561-9
  • 28. Henke VG, Bateman BT, Leffert LR. Focused review: spinal anesthesia in severe preeclampsia. Anesth Analg. 2013; 117(3): 686-93[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments