Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Published by: Kowsar

Advantages of Digital Subtraction Angiography During Nerve Block

Sun kyung Park 1 and Yun Suk Choi 1 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea
Article information
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine: December 01, 2014, 4 (5); e19927
  • Published Online: November 19, 2014
  • Article Type: Case Report
  • Received: May 2, 2014
  • Revised: June 1, 2014
  • Accepted: June 12, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/aapm.19927

To Cite: Park S K, Choi Y S. Advantages of Digital Subtraction Angiography During Nerve Block, Anesth Pain Med. 2014 ; 4(5):e19927. doi: 10.5812/aapm.19927.

Abstract
Copyright © 2014, Iranian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISRAPM). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
2. Case Presentation
3. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
  • 1. Jasper JF. Role of digital subtraction fluoroscopic imaging in detecting intravascular injections. Pain Physician. 2003; 6(3): 369-72[PubMed]
  • 2. Chang Chien GC, Candido KD, Knezevic NN. Digital subtraction angiography does not reliably prevent paraplegia associated with lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Pain Physician. 2012; 15(6): 515-23[PubMed]
  • 3. Kim do W, Han KR, Kim C, Chae YJ. Intravascular flow patterns in transforaminal epidural injections: a comparative study of the cervical and lumbar vertebral segments. Anesth Analg. 2009; 109(1): 233-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Furman MB, Giovanniello MT, O'Brien EM. Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(1): 21-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. McLean JP, Sigler JD, Plastaras CT, Garvan CW, Rittenberg JD. The rate of detection of intravascular injection in cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections with and without digital subtraction angiography. PM R. 2009; 1(7): 636-42[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Ionasec RI, Heigl B, Hornegger J. Acquisition-related motion compensation for digital subtraction angiography. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2009; 33(4): 256-66[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Takeshima N, Miyakawa H, Okuda K, Hattori S, Hagiwara S, Takatani J, et al. Evaluation of the therapeutic results of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis for failed back surgery syndrome. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 102(3): 400-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Hussain A, Erdek M. Interventional pain management for failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Pract. 2014; 14(1): 64-78[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Helm Ii S, Benyamin RM, Chopra P, Deer TR, Justiz R. Percutaneous adhesiolysis in the management of chronic low back pain in post lumbar surgery syndrome and spinal stenosis: a systematic review. Pain Physician. 2012; 15(4)-62[PubMed]
  • 10. Lee MH, Yang KS, Kim YH, Jung HD, Lim SJ, Moon DE. Accuracy of live fluoroscopy to detect intravascular injection during lumbar transforaminal epidural injections. Korean J Pain. 2010; 23(1): 18-23[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments