Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Published by: Kowsar

Validity and Reliability of the Iranian Version of the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire

Siamak Yaghoobi 1 , Monadi Hamidfar 1 , Douglas M. Lawson 2 , Bengt Fridlund 3 , Paul Stewart Myles 4 and Amir H. Pakpour 5 , 6 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
2 Faculty of Medicine, Medical Education Research Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
3 School of Health Sciences, Jonkoping University, Jonkoping, Sweden
4 Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
5 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
6 Department of Public Health, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
Article information
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine: April 30, 2015, 5 (2); e20350
  • Published Online: April 20, 2015
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: May 19, 2014
  • Revised: July 6, 2014
  • Accepted: August 15, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/aapm.20350

To Cite: Yaghoobi S, Hamidfar M, M. Lawson D, Fridlund B, Myles P S, et al. Validity and Reliability of the Iranian Version of the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire, Anesth Pain Med. 2015 ; 5(2):e20350. doi: 10.5812/aapm.20350.

Abstract
Copyright © 2015, Iranian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISRAPM). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Lee A, Lum ME. Measuring anaesthetic outcomes. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996; 24(6): 685-93[PubMed]
  • 2. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988; 260(12): 1743-8[PubMed]
  • 3. Swan BA, Maislin G, Traber KB. Symptom distress and functional status changes during the first seven days after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1998; 86(4): 739-45[PubMed]
  • 4. Dexter F, Aker J, Wright WA. Development of a measure of patient satisfaction with monitored anesthesia care: the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale. Anesthesiology. 1997; 87(4): 865-73[PubMed]
  • 5. Van Herck P, Vanhaecht K, Deneckere S, Bellemans J, Panella M, Barbieri A, et al. Key interventions and outcomes in joint arthroplasty clinical pathways: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010; 16(1): 39-49[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Myles PS, Reeves MD, Anderson H, Weeks AM. Measurement of quality of recovery in 5672 patients after anaesthesia and surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000; 28(3): 276-80[PubMed]
  • 7. Hashemi SB, Monshizadeh L. The Quality of Life from the Point of View of Parents in Pre-Lingual Deaf Children after 1.5 Years of Cochlear Implantation in Shiraz, Southern Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2011; 13(6): 431-3
  • 8. Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000; 84(1): 11-5[PubMed]
  • 9. Herrera FJ, Wong J, Chung F. A systematic review of postoperative recovery outcomes measurements after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 2007; 105(1): 63-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Royse CF, Williams Z, Purser S, Newman S. Recovery after nasal surgery vs. tonsillectomy: discriminant validation of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014; 58(3): 345-51[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Kluivers KB, Riphagen I, Vierhout ME, Brolmann HA, de Vet HC. Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instruments. Surgery. 2008; 143(2): 206-15[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, et al. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999; 88(1): 83-90[PubMed]
  • 13. Myles PS, Viira D, Hunt JO. Quality of life at three years after cardiac surgery: relationship with preoperative status and quality of recovery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006; 34(2): 176-83[PubMed]
  • 14. Myles PS, Hunt JO, Fletcher H, Solly R, Woodward D, Kelly S. Relation between quality of recovery in hospital and quality of life at 3 months after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2001; 95(4): 862-7[PubMed]
  • 15. Gornall BF, Myles PS, Smith CL, Burke JA, Leslie K, Pereira MJ, et al. Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 111(2): 161-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Tanaka Y, Wakita T, Fukuhara S, Nishiwada M, Inoue S, Kawaguchi M, et al. Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40. J Anesth. 2011; 25(4): 509-15[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Karaman S, Arici S, Dogru S, Karaman T, Tapar H, Kaya Z, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014; 12: 8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Rybak MJ, McGrath BJ. Combination antimicrobial therapy for bacterial infections. Guidelines for the clinician. Drugs. 1996; 52(3): 390-405[PubMed]
  • 19. Adelmanesh F, Arvantaj A, Rashki H, Ketabchi S, Montazeri A, Raissi G. Results from the translation and adaptation of the Iranian Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (I-SF-MPQ): preliminary evidence of its reliability, construct validity and sensitivity in an Iranian pain population. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2011; 3(1): 27[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, Leplege A, Sullivan M, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51(11): 913-23[PubMed]
  • 21. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24): 3186-91[PubMed]
  • 22. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951; 16(3): 297-334[DOI]
  • 23. Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966; 19(1): 3-11[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Myles PS, Hunt JO, Moloney JT. Postoperative 'minor' complications. Comparison between men and women. Anaesthesia. 1997; 52(4): 300-6[PubMed]
  • 25. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000; 53(5): 459-68[PubMed]
  • 26. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. 1993;
  • 27. McIntyre P. Acute Pain Management: Scientific Evidence. 2005;
  • 28. Wu CL, Richman JM. Postoperative pain and quality of recovery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2004; 17(5): 455-60[PubMed]
  • 29. Leslie K, Troedel S, Irwin K, Pearce F, Ugoni A, Gillies R, et al. Quality of recovery from anesthesia in neurosurgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2003; 99(5): 1158-65[PubMed]
  • 30. Buchanan FF, Myles PS, Cicuttini F. Effect of patient sex on general anaesthesia and recovery. Br J Anaesth. 2011; 106(6): 832-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 31. Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis. 1985; 38(1): 27-36[PubMed]
  • 32. Knapp TR, Campbell-Heider N. Numbers of observations and variables in multivariate analyses. West J Nurs Res. 1989; 11(5): 634-41[PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments