Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Published by: Kowsar

Ultrasound-Guided Out-of-Plane vs. In-Plane Interscalene Catheters: A Randomized, Prospective Study

Eric S. Schwenk 1 , * , Kishor Gandhi 2 , Jaime L. Baratta 1 , Marc Torjman 1 , Richard H. Epstein 1 , Jaeyoon Chung 1 , Benjamin A. Vaghari 3 , David Beausang 1 , Elird Bojaxhi 4 and Bernadette Grady 5
Authors Information
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
2 Princeton University Medical Center, Princeton University, Plainsboro Township, USA
3 Holy Cross Hospital, Philadelphia, USA
4 Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA
5 Department of Nursing, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
Article information
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine: December 01, 2015, 5 (6); e31111
  • Published Online: December 5, 2015
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: July 1, 2015
  • Revised: August 4, 2015
  • Accepted: August 18, 2015
  • DOI: 10.5812/aapm.31111

To Cite: Schwenk E S, Gandhi K, Baratta J L, Torjman M, Epstein R H, et al. Ultrasound-Guided Out-of-Plane vs. In-Plane Interscalene Catheters: A Randomized, Prospective Study, Anesth Pain Med. 2015 ; 5(6):e31111. doi: 10.5812/aapm.31111.

Abstract
Copyright © 2015, Iranian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISRAPM). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Mariano ER, Afra R, Loland VJ, Sandhu NS, Bellars RH, Bishop ML, et al. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block via an ultrasound-guided posterior approach: a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2009; 108(5): 1688-94[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Fredrickson MJ, Ball CM, Dalgleish AJ. Analgesic effectiveness of a continuous versus single-injection interscalene block for minor arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010; 35(1): 28-33[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Antonakakis JG, Sites BD, Shiffrin J. Ultrasound-guided posterior approach for the placement of a continuous interscalene catheter. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009; 34(1): 64-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Mariano ER, Loland VJ, Ilfeld BM. Interscalene perineural catheter placement using an ultrasound-guided posterior approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009; 34(1): 60-3[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Sandefo I, Bernard JM, Elstraete V, Lebrun T, Polin B, Alla F, et al. Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia after shoulder surgery: catheter insertion by the posterior approach. Anesth Analg. 2005; 100(5): 1496-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Fredrickson MJ, Ball CM, Dalgleish AJ. Posterior versus anterolateral approach interscalene catheter placement: a prospective randomized trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011; 36(2): 125-33[PubMed]
  • 7. Ilfeld BM, Fredrickson MJ, Mariano ER. Ultrasound-guided perineural catheter insertion: three approaches but few illuminating data. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010; 35(2): 123-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Cummings KC, Napierkowski DE, Parra-Sanchez I, Kurz A, Dalton JE, Brems JJ, et al. Effect of dexamethasone on the duration of interscalene nerve blocks with ropivacaine or bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 2011; 107(3): 446-53[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Capdevila X, Dadure C, Bringuier S, Bernard N, Biboulet P, Gaertner E, et al. Effect of patient-controlled perineural analgesia on rehabilitation and pain after ambulatory orthopedic surgery: a multicenter randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2006; 105(3): 566-73[PubMed]
  • 10. Winnie AP. Interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 1970; 49(3): 455-66[PubMed]
  • 11. Sardesai AM, Patel R, Denny NM, Menon DK, Dixon AK, Herrick MJ, et al. Interscalene brachial plexus block: can the risk of entering the spinal canal be reduced? A study of needle angles in volunteers undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology. 2006; 105(1): 9-13[PubMed]
  • 12. Gaus P, Heb B, Tanyay Z, Muller-Breitenlohner H. [Epidural malpositioning of an interscalene plexus catheter]. Anaesthesist. 2011; 60(9): 850-3[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Faust A, Fournier R, Hagon O, Hoffmeyer P, Gamulin Z. Partial sensory and motor deficit of ipsilateral lower limb after continuous interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 2006; 102(1): 288-90[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments