Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison of the Success Rate of Intubation Between the LMA Fastrach and AirQ-ILA Methods in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery During General Anaesthesia

Seydalireza Seyed Siamdoust 1 , Faranak Rokhtabnak 2 , * , Soudabeh Djalali Motlagh 1 , Poupak Rahimzadeh 3 , Valiollah Hassani 3 and Mahdi Farnaghizad 1
Authors Information
1 Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Anesthesia, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Pain Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine: August 2018, 8 (4); e63424
  • Published Online: August 11, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: October 30, 2017
  • Revised: July 22, 2018
  • Accepted: August 3, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/aapm.63424

To Cite: Seyed Siamdoust S, Rokhtabnak F, Djalali Motlagh S, Rahimzadeh P, Hassani V, et al. Comparison of the Success Rate of Intubation Between the LMA Fastrach and AirQ-ILA Methods in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery During General Anaesthesia, Anesth Pain Med. 2018 ; 8(4):e63424. doi: 10.5812/aapm.63424.

Copyright © 2018, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
  • 1. Benumof JL. The ASA difficult airway algorithm: new thoughts and considerations. Handbook of Difficult Airway Management. Philadelphia, Pa: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 31-4.
  • 2. Brain AI, Verghese C, Addy EV, Kapila A, Brimacombe J. The intubating laryngeal mask. II: A preliminary clinical report of a new means of intubating the trachea. Br J Anaesth. 1997;79(6):704-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/79.6.704. [PubMed: 9496199].
  • 3. Timmermann A, Russo SG. Which airway should I use? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007;20(6):595-9. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282f13a77. [PubMed: 17989557].
  • 4. Pandit JJ, MacLachlan K, Dravid RM, Popat MT. Comparison of times to achieve tracheal intubation with three techniques using the laryngeal or intubating laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 2002;57(2):128-32. doi: 10.1046/j.0003-2409.2001.02401.x. [PubMed: 11871949].
  • 5. Martin C, Nefzger T, Lotz G. [Atemwegsmanagement – alternatives atemwegsmanagement im rettungsdienst]. AINS-Anästhesiologie Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherapie. 2016;51(4):254-62. German. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-103153.
  • 6. Rajagopal MR, Paul J. Applied anatomy and physiology of the airway and breathing. India J Anaesth. 2005;49(4):251-6.
  • 7. Brimacombe J. A proposed classification system for extraglottic airway devices. Anesthesiology. 2004;101(2):559. [PubMed: 15277956].
  • 8. Pournajafian A, Alimian M, Rokhtabnak F, Ghodraty M, Mojri M. Success rate of airway devices insertion: laryngeal mask airway versus supraglottic gel device. Anesth Pain Med. 2015;5(2). e22068. doi: 10.5812/aapm.22068. [PubMed: 25866709]. [PubMed Central: PMC4389102].
  • 9. Caponas G. Intubating laryngeal mask airway. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002;30(5):551-69. [PubMed: 12413253].
  • 10. Hagberg CA. Special devices and techniques. Anesthesiol Clin North America. 2002;20(4):907-32. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8537(02)00023-8.
  • 11. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52(7):739-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03016565. [PubMed: 16103390].
  • 12. Henderson JJ, Popat MT, Latto IP, Pearce AC; Difficult Airway Society. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for management of the unanticipated difficult intubation. Anaesthesia. 2004;59(7):675-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03831.x. [PubMed: 15200543].
  • 13. Karim YM, Swanson DE. Comparison of blind tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA Fastrach) and the Air-Q. Anaesthesia. 2011;66(3):185-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06625.x. [PubMed: 21320087].
  • 14. Attarde VB, Kotekar N, Shetty SM. Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway: A study of the second generation supraglottic airway device. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(5):343-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.181596. [PubMed: 27212722]. [PubMed Central: PMC4870948].
  • 15. Jagannathan N, Roth AG, Sohn LE, Pak TY, Amin S, Suresh S. The new air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for tracheal intubation in children with anticipated difficult airway: a case series. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19(6):618-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.02990.x. [PubMed: 19655442].
  • 16. Ambesh SP, Singh N, Rao PB, Gupta D, Singh PK, Singh U. A combination of the modified Mallampati score, thyromental distance, anatomical abnormality, and cervical mobility (M-TAC) predicts difficult laryngoscopy better than Mallampati classification. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2013;51(2):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2013.06.005. [PubMed: 23968655].
  • 17. Malhotra SK, Bharath KV, Saini V. Comparison of success rate of intubation through Air-Q with ILMA using two different endotracheal tubes. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(4):242-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.179448. [PubMed: 27141106]. [PubMed Central: PMC4840803].
  • 18. Shamaa MA, Alia DA, El-Sayed M. Intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q for blind tracheal intubation. Res Opin Anesth Intensive Care. 2015;2(4):101. doi: 10.4103/2356-9115.178901.
  • 19. Garzon Sanchez JC, Lopez Correa T, Sastre Rincon JA. [Blind tracheal intubation with the air-Q((R)) (ILA-Cookgas) mask. A comparison with the ILMA-Fastrach laryngeal intubation mask]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2014;61(4):190-5. Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2013.11.002. [PubMed: 24556513].
  • 20. Badawi R, Mohamed NN, Al-Haq MMA. Tips and tricks to increase the success rate of blind tracheal intubation through the Air-Q™ versus the intubating laryngeal mask airway Fastrach™. Egypt J Anaesth. 2014;30(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.egja.2013.08.002.
  • 21. Abdel-Halim TM, Abo El Enin MA, Elgoushi MM, Afifi MG, Atwa HS. Comparative study between Air-Q and intubating laryngeal mask airway when used as conduit for fiber-optic. Egypt J Anaesth. 2014;30(2):107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.egja.2013.10.004.
  • 22. Neoh EU, Choy YC. Comparison of the air-Q ILA™ and the LMA-Fastrach™ in airway management during general anaesthesia. South Afr J Anaesth Analg. 2014;18(3):150-5. doi: 10.1080/22201173.2012.10872844.
  • 23. Erlacher W, Tiefenbrunner H, Kastenbauer T, Schwarz S, Fitzgerald RD. CobraPLUS and Cookgas air-Q versus Fastrach for blind endotracheal intubation: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28(3):181-6. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328340c352. [PubMed: 21192270].
  • 24. Sastre JA, López T, Garzón JC. Blind tracheal intubation through air-Q® supralaryngeal device: comparison with intubating laryngeal mask airway. Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, University Hospital of Salamanca Walk of San Vicente; 2009. 124 p.
  • 25. Kim YY, Kang GH, Kim WH, Choi HY, Jang YS, Lee YJ, et al. Comparison of blind intubation through supraglottic devices and direct laryngoscopy by novices: a simulation manikin study. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016;3(2):75-80. doi: 10.15441/ceem.15.069. [PubMed: 27752621]. [PubMed Central: PMC5051610].
  • 26. Yamada R, Maruyama K, Hirabayashi G, Koyama Y, Andoh T. Effect of head position on the success rate of blind intubation using intubating supraglottic airway devices. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(7):1193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.02.076. [PubMed: 27113126].
  • 27. Yamada R, Maruyama K, Akihisa Y, Koyama Y, Andoh T. Comparison of success rate of blind intubation through Air-Q and LMA FastrachTM in sniffing position and neutral position. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30:249. doi: 10.1097/00003643-201306001-00778.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments