Epidural Tramadol, is it a Good Option for Cesarean Section?

AUTHORS

Luciana de Souza Cota Carvalho 1 , *

1 Unifenas University of Medical Sciences, Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

How to Cite: Carvalho L D S C. Epidural Tramadol, is it a Good Option for Cesarean Section?, Anesth Pain Med. 2011 ; 1(2):111-112. doi: 10.5812/kowsar.22287523.2105.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 1 (2); 111-112
Published Online: September 26, 2011
Article Type: Letter
Received: August 16, 2011
Revised: August 19, 2011
Accepted: August 23, 2011
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT

Keywords

Epidural anesthesia Tramadol Cesarean section

Copyright © 2011, Iranian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISRAPM). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

Dear Editor,

I read the article entitled “The Maternal and Neonatal Effects of Adding Tramadol to 2% Lidocaine in Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section” (1). The authors demonstrated that tramadol 50 mg or 100 mg associated to lidocaine is appropriate for this surgery and also improve sensory and motor blockade effects without any increase in complications. However some important reflections and some missing data may be consider for full understanding of the article. For instance, one question came to my mind during the analysis-why haven’t the article focused on tramadol applied on spinal anesthesia? Neuraxial anesthesia is undoubtedly the most appropriate technique for elective cesarean delivery since the relative risk of mortality from general versus regional anesthesia is 16. 7 (2). General anesthesia in obstetric patients is a procedure with higher rates of serious and life-threatening complications, mainly related to airway management once the physiologic changes of pregnancy determine higher incidence of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents and difficult airway (3,4). Until 1980, epidural anesthesia was the primary choice of neuraxial technique for cesarean delivery because spinal anesthesia was associated with a high risk of postdural puncture headache. After this period, the introduction of pencil-point spinal needles and several other advantages, the single-shot spinal anesthesia became the technique of choice for cesarean (5, 6). Besides that, tramadol intrathecal have been used with success for labor and major gynecological surgeries (7, 8).

Other important comments when reflecting about the results section, I was wondering the following points could have been provided to allow fully result analysis:

  1. The mean dose of lidocaine and sufentanil request intraoperative were presented, but it was not showed the number of patients that demanded complementation analgesia and when;

  2. Around 30% of patients present some complications but they did not mention what kind of complications and these numbers is relatively bigger than other found on literature (9) and

  3. They also comment that general anesthesia is an option when maternal apnea lasts longer than 20 seconds or enable to speech or if the mother lost consciousness or did not respond to stimuli but they did not comment if some patients need it, considering the risks of general anesthesia, it is an important date.

Finally, the article core idea is very interesting, since epidural tramadol has comparable analgesic efficacy with lower side effects than epidural morphine, specifically concerning about respiratory depression (10). Although, this article still demands further improvements.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Imani F, Entezary SR, Alebouyeh MR, Parhizgar S. The maternal and neonatal effects of adding tramadol to 2% lidocaine in epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesth Pain. 2011; 1(1) : 25 -9 [DOI]

  • 2.

    Hawkins JL, Koonin LM, Palmer SK, Gibbs CP. Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979-1990. Anesthesiology. 1997; 86(2) : 277 -84 [PubMed]

  • 3.

    Stamer U, Wulf H. Complications of obstetric anaesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2001; 14(3) : 317 -22 [PubMed]

  • 4.

    Goldszmidt E. Principles and practices of obstetric airway management. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008; 26(1) : 109 -25, vii [DOI][PubMed]

  • 5.

    Halpern S, Preston R. Postdural puncture headache and spinal needle design. Metaanalyses. Anesthesiology. 1994; 81(6) : 1376 -83 [PubMed]

  • 6.

    Riley ET, Cohen SE, Macario A, Desai JB, Ratner EF. Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a comparison of time efficiency, costs, charges, and complications. Anesth Analg. 1995; 80(4) : 709 -12 [PubMed]

  • 7.

    Frikha N, Ellachtar M, Mebazaa MS, Ben Ammar MS. Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor--comparison of sufentanil vs tramadol. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2007; 19(1) : 87 -96 [PubMed]

  • 8.

    Chakraborty S, Chakrabarti J, Bhattacharya D. Intrathecal tramadol added to bupivacaine as spinal anesthetic increases analgesic effect of the spinal blockade after major gynecological surgeries. Indian J Pharmacol. 2008; 40(4) : 180 -2 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 9.

    Chau-in W, Hintong T, Rodanant O, Lekprasert V, Punjasawadwong Y, Charuluxananan S, et al. Anesthesia-related complications of caesarean delivery in Thailand: 16,697 cases from the Thai Anaesthesia Incidents Study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010; 93(11) : 1274 -83 [PubMed]

  • 10.

    Demiraran Y, Kocaman B, Akman RY. A comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of single-dose epidural tramadol versus morphine in children. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 95(4) : 510 -3 [DOI][PubMed]

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: