Effect of Trigger Point Injection on Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Source

AUTHORS

Seyed Reza Saeidian 1 , Mohammad Reza Pipelzadeh 2 , * , Saleh Rasras 3 , Masud Zeinali 3

1 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahwaz, Iran

2 Department of Anesthesia, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahwaz, Iran

3 Department of Neurosurgery, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahwaz, Iran

How to Cite: Saeidian S R, Pipelzadeh M R, Rasras S, Zeinali M. Effect of Trigger Point Injection on Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Source, Anesth Pain Med. 2014 ; 4(4):e15500. doi: 10.5812/aapm.15500.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 4 (4); e15500
Published Online: September 8, 2014
Article Type: Research Article
Received: October 20, 2013
Revised: November 17, 2013
Accepted: March 7, 2014
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: Active muscular trigger points (aMTPs) presenting with radiating pain can interfere in diagnosis and treatment of patients suffering from lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Objectives: We aimed to diagnose and evaluate the trigger point therapy on the outcome of pain in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Materials and Methods: A total of 98 patients were enrolled suffered with chronic pain andlumbosacral radiculopathy at L4-L5 and L5-S1 who were candidates of non-surgical management. All patients received conservative modalities, including bed rest, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAID), and physiotherapy. These treatments continued for a week. Patients were examined for the presence of trigger points in their lower extremities. Those who had trigger points were divided into 2 groups (TP and N). Patients in TP group underwent trigger point injection therapy. No further therapy was done for the N group. Pain scores and straight leg raise (SLR) test in both groups were collected and analyzed on the seventh and 10th days of the therapy. Results were analyzed by paired t test and chi-square test.

Results: Out of 98 patients, 64 had trigger points. Thirty-two patients were assigned to each group. Pain scores (Mean ± SD) in TP group was 7.12 ± 1.13 and in N group was 6.7 ± 1.16, P = 0.196. Following the treatment, pain scores were 2.4 ± 1.5 in TP group and 4.06 ± 1.76 in N group P = 0.008. SLR test became negative in all patients in TP group but only in 6 (19%) patients in N group, P = 0.001.

Conclusions: Results show that trigger point injection therapy in patients suffering from chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy with trigger points can significantly improve their recovery, and conservative therapy may not be adequate.

Keywords

Trigger Point Radiculopathy Low Back Pain

Copyright © 2014, Iranian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISRAPM). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Background

Lumbosacral radiculopathy is a common complaint in musculoskeletal consultation clinics (1).It develops due to pressure or injury to the nerve roots in this region, which results in related clinical signs, like positive straight leg raise(SLR) test (2). Other interfering diseases include disk herniation, diabetes mellitus, scoliosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatologic diseases, infectious diseases, vascular diseases, and tumors (3, 4). Trigger points are alsovery painful musculoskeletal points with palpable nodules in muscle fibers (5), and their pain may be severe and radiates to extensive areas. It has some specifications such as limitation of joints ranges of motion (ROM), palpable nodules, and radiating pain (6). These points are only formed in muscles. Physical examination is not the only reliable and diagnostic tool (7). These points may be formed in acute muscle overload, muscle fatigue, chilling, gross trauma, cardiac and visceral diseases such as gall bladder problems and renal colic, arthritic joints, and emotional distresses (5).

Primary treatment of chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy includes bed rest, physiotherapy, and administration of anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients generally respond well to the treatment in 6 to 12 weeks. Those who do not show improvement may need steroid injection. Steroids can reduce pressure and edema on nerves and alleviate the pain. However, few patients may need surgery (2). Trigger point therapy includes myotherapy, (massage, deep pressure, or stretching), heat therapy, electrotherapy, low laser therapy, and injection therapy (8, 9). Pain due to trigger points often coexists with lumbosacral radiculopathy. Based on some investigations, Trigger point are probably more common in patients with radiculopathy. The incidence was noted to be as high as 51% in cervical radiculopathy. Pain due to the active TPx may coexist with radiculopathy and add to the patient discomfort.

With regard to the diagnostic and therapeutic importance of TPx, more studies are required for the differentiation of these superimposed pain sources. Moreover, other musculoskeletal disorders that induce trigger points may coexist with lumbosacral radiculopathy. In cases of combined pain, treatment of active TPx is important because, standard treatment of radiculopathy may fail. Early treatment of TPx may avoid unnecessary interventional and costly diagnostic procedures (10, 11).This study aimed to determine the prevalence of active trigger points accompanying lumbosacral radiculopathy and to evaluate the effect of TPx injection on patient’s pain scores and SLR.

2. Objectives

Although the present study did not aim to evaluate the impact of rehabilitation on disk disease, it is hoped that the prescribed physical therapy prevents complications of inactivity.

3. Materials and Methods

Following approval of the Ethics Committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, all patients referred to our orthopedic clinic because of lumbosacral radiculopathy were enrolled in this study during a 3-year-period, and their consents were taken. After history taking and physical examination, the normal blood count, including CBC, FBS, and ESR, as well aslumbosacral x-ray, MRI and EMG studies in favor of the lumbosacral radiculopathy were taken from the study patients. Then, pain severity (using VAS score) and SLR were checked. SLR is considered positive if the patients feel pain during 0 to 70 degrees of leg raising. If leg raising did not provoke any pain it would be considered as a negative SLR (4). All patients were examined and referred by 2 experienced neurosurgeons. They took a lumbosacral x-ray and magnetic resonance image (MRI) study to confirm the L5-S1 disk disease. Thus, the patients diagnosed with spinal tumor, spinal fracture, or spondylolisthesis were excluded from the study.

In the next step, electro diagnostic studies (EDX) were performed in order to prove that patients' root problem were caused by the lumbosacral disk diseases. These studies consisted of measuring lower limbs sensory and motor nerves conduction to screen the presence of peripheral polyneuropathy processes, H-reflex evaluation of bilateral lower limbs, and electromyography studies of adductor long us, medial head of gastrocnemius, tibialisanterior, tibialisposterior, short head of biceps femoris, and lumbar Para spinal muscles of the patients (12). If the EDX revealed the existence of a peripheral polyneuropathy or myopathy process in a patient, he or was excluded from the study (2). Also the patients should have a normal complete blood count (CBC) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) to exclude patients with infection or possible inflammatory diseases that caused low back pain. Furthermore, all febrile patients and patients who had a fasting blood sugar (FBS) more than 126 mg/dL were excluded from this study.

Pain severity was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain), and performing SLR test by slowly raising their lower limb while keeping their knees extended (4). All patients were admitted to in-patient physical medicine and rehabilitation ward for controlling their radicular symptoms, performing initial bed rest accompanied by physical therapy, undertaking essential educations and supervising the study program. As soon as the patients' pain subsided and they learned to avoid heavy activities, which increase intra-disk pressure, so they can carry on most daily activities, they were discharged from the hospital and followed up as the out-patients (13). Patients were examined for the existence of trigger points in their limb- girdles and involved lower extremities before initiation of bed rest.

Trigger points were diagnosed based on clinical signs and pain eliciting character after 2 kg /cm² pressure application on the area suspected for the presence of TPx and comparing with their opposite side (5). Daily physiotherapy consists of active assistive back exercises and physical modality agents such as applying hot pack for 10 minutes and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulations. Also patients received Diclofenac Na, (a fixed dose of 25 mg) orally four times a day (13). After a week, all patients were evaluated for the presence of trigger points and degrees of pain complaints in their back and lower extremities. Those who did not have TPx or pain were excluded and discharged from the hospital. Patients who had trigger points and still complained of radiculopathy were divided into two groups (Group TP and N).

Group N received the former conservative therapy for three more consecutive days. Group TP received injections at their trigger points along with the treatment of the N group (7, 10). The injection performed by using 21 G needle by perpendicular insertion over the center of each active trigger point, three times at one session while injecting 1mL lidocaine 2% for each trigger point. Every patient received 1mL (40 mg) triamcinolone too. In patients suffered from more than one trigger point, the total dose of triamcinolone was fixed so that the triamcinolone was diluted in lidocaine. The pain severity of both groups was compared using paired t test. Furthermore, their SLR tests results on seventh and 10th days of admission were compared by chi-square test. For statistical analysis, SPSS software version 19 was used. P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

4. Results

MRI pictures of two patients showed tumors around their spines; hence, they were excluded from the study. A total number of 98 patients were entered into study. Sixty-four (65%) of them had the criteria of trigger point and were enrolled in the study. Two groups were matched demographically with respect to age, sex, and duration of their pain (Table 1). Overall, the whole 204 trigger points of patients were injected. The mean number of trigger points in each patient was 3 ± 1. The common affected muscles of the studied patients have shown in Table 1. The EDX findings of all patients were compatible with the clinical impression of L5 and S1 roots involvement. Their lower limbs nerves conduction velocities were within normal range, which excluded the existence of peripheral polyneuropathy processes. Sixty-three patients showed H-reflex abnormality indicative of S1 roots lesions. All patients demonstrated electromyography abnormalities in their lower limbs or paraspinal muscles. The mean and standard deviation of patients’ hospitalization time were 5 ± 2 d. The total dose of Diclofenac Na was 900 mg for each patient in nine consecutive days. The total injected volume of Xylocaine 2% was 204 mL. On the seventh day, the pain score was 6.7 ± 1.16 in TP group and 7.12 ± 1.13 in N group. On the 10th day TP group had mean pain score of 2.4 ± 1.5 compared with 4.06 ± 1.76 for group N (P < 0.008). Moreover, all patients in TP group had negative SLR while only 6 patients (19%) in group N recovered their SLR (P < 0.01).

Table 1. Demography of Patient Groups a,b
Pain Duration, dMale/Female RatioAge, yGroup
57 ± 361.2849.1 ± 13.4N
55 ± 371.2146 ± 13TP
0.770.540.33P Value

a Data are presented as Mean ± SD.

bDemographic data: no significant difference in 2 groups.

5. Discussion

Trigger points are commonly seen in painful skeletal diseases. It follows mechanical or neurologic stimulation. Our study emphasizes that timely trigger point’s injection has better prognosis and is important in the treatment of chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy. Pain scores get lower and SLR gets higher. Failure of TPx treatment may result in muscular stiffness and limitation of activity, which can increase disability and worsening of the original ailment. In our study, 65% of lumbosacral radiculopathy cases had positive active trigger points, which are higher than previous reports (8-11). Patients who received TPx injections had lower pain scores and almost full SLR recovery. Coexistence of trigger points and different painful musculoskeletal diseases has been previously reported (12, 13). However, the significance of early trigger point therapy is emphasized by our study.

Sixty-five percent of our patients had lower extremity trigger points which this number is higher than previous reports (7, 11). It is also important to note that SLR may be positive due to active trigger points, which make it of diagnostic significance. Muscular stiffness due to active trigger point pain and reduced range of joint motion can be the comorbid disabling factors which may interfere with the treatment of radiculopathy. Disability may also be due to central sensitization or impaired local tissue circulation (14, 15). In other words, trigger points may induce central sensitization and a chronic pain syndrome.

It has been noted in previous reports that production of calcitonin gene-related protein decreases following trigger point injection. This substance is responsible for inducing a central sensitization process (16). Trigger points resulting from chronic inflammatory causes were not specifically studied in our study. This can be a limiting factor. Craig revealed that the results of SLR could be influenced by determinants such as lumbar spine stability, pelvic-abdominal bracing, and activation of the musculature under the spine (17). The treatment goal in conservative management of lumbar radiculopathy is to reduce inflammation, decrease pain, and resolve the damages of the involved roots. Although bed rest has been an important part of this nonoperative treatment, prolonged bed rest is no longer suggested and is recommended only for symptom control. As long as the patients are educated to avoid activities, which tend to increase intra-disk pressure, they can carry on most of their daily activities. One study explored the effect of 14 days of horizontal bed rest, induce body deconditioning, and changing parameters of body swing and ankle function (18). Another research showed that bed rest still plays an important part in rehabilitation of patients suffering from degenerative disk diseases (13). Trigger points are frequently seen in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy and their early recognition and treatment could improve patient’s pain and motion and eventually the outcome. Injection of trigger points is suggested as a good adjuvant therapy when these points coexist with radiculopathy.

Acknowledgements

Footnote

References

  • 1.

    Konstantinovic LM, Kanjuh ZM, Milovanovic AN, Cutovic MR, Djurovic AG, Savic VG, et al. Acute low back pain with radiculopathy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010; 28(4) : 553 -60 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 2.

    Bratt JM, Franzi LM, Linderholm AL, O'Roark EM, Kenyon NJ, Last JA. Arginase inhibition in airways from normal and nitric oxide synthase 2-knockout mice exposed to ovalbumin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010; 242(1) : 1 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 3.

    Love JG. The Differential Diagnosis of Intraspinal Tumors and Protruded Intervertebral Disks and Their Surgical Treatment*. Neurosurg J. 1944; 1(4) : 275 -90 [DOI]

  • 4.

    Canbulat N, Sasani M, Ataker Y, Oktenoglu T, Berker N, Ercelen O, et al. A rehabilitation protocol for patients with lumbar degenerative disk disease treated with lumbar total disk replacement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92(4) : 670 -6 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 5.

    Travell J, Simons D. Myfascial pain and dysfunction the Trigger Point Manual. 1992;

  • 6.

    Travell J, Simons D. Myfascial pain and dysfunction the Trigger Point Manual. 1992; : 5 -44

  • 7.

    Lucas N, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Moran R, Bogduk N. Reliability of physical examination for diagnosis of myofascial trigger points: a systematic review of the literature. Clin J Pain. 2009; 25(1) : 80 -9 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 8.

    Shah JP, Danoff JV, Desai MJ, Parikh S, Nakamura LY, Phillips TM, et al. Biochemicals associated with pain and inflammation are elevated in sites near to and remote from active myofascial trigger points. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89(1) : 16 -23 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 9.

    Lauder TD. Musculoskeletal disorders that frequently mimic radiculopathy. Phys Med Rehabil Cl North America. 2002; 13(3) : 469 -85 [DOI]

  • 10.

    Cannon DE, Dillingham TR, Miao H, Andary MT, Pezzin LE. Musculoskeletal disorders in referrals for suspected lumbosacral radiculopathy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 86(12) : 957 -61 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 11.

    Sari H, Akarirmak U, Uludag M. Active myofascial trigger points might be more frequent in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012; 48(2) : 237 -44 [PubMed]

  • 12.

    de Oliveira RA, de Andrade DC, Machado AG, Teixeira MJ. Central poststroke pain: somatosensory abnormalities and the presence of associated myofascial pain syndrome. BMC Neurol. 2012; 12 : 89 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 13.

    O'Neill S, Manniche C, Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L. Generalized deep-tissue hyperalgesia in patients with chronic low-back pain. Eur J Pain. 2007; 11(4) : 415 -20 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 14.

    Sikdar S, Ortiz R, Gebreab T, Gerber LH, Shah JP. Understanding the vascular environment of myofascial trigger points using ultrasonic imaging and computational modeling. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010; 2010 : 5302 -5 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 15.

    Grinnell AD, Chen BM, Kashani A, Lin J, Suzuki K, Kidokoro Y. The role of integrins in the modulation of neurotransmitter release from motor nerve terminals by stretch and hypertonicity. J Neurocytol. 2003; 32(5-8) : 489 -503 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 16.

    Venancio R. A, Alencar FG, Zamperini C. Different substances and dry-needling injections in patients with myofascial pain and headaches. Cranio. 2008; 26(2) : 96 -103 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 17.

    Liebenson C, Karpowicz AM, Brown SH, Howarth SJ, McGill SM. The active straight leg raise test and lumbar spine stability. PM R. 2009; 1(6) : 530 -5 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 18.

    Sarabon N, Rosker J. Effect of 14 days of bed rest in older adults on parameters of the body sway and on the local ankle function. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013; 23(6) : 1505 -11 [DOI][PubMed]

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: